[Winpcap-users] PacketReceivePacket error out on allocatingbuffergerater than 4MB
Pushkar Tiwari
pushkartiwari at gmail.com
Thu Jul 29 13:22:27 PDT 2010
Thanks Gianluca.
I will modify code to pass the value in Bytes rather in KB. You mentioned
that we should not be using Packet API, it's subject to change. Can you
please provide me some alternative way supported by winpcap API, so that I
can allocate the higher buffer size.
Thanks,
Pushkar
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Gianluca Varenni <
gianluca.varenni at cacetech.com> wrote:
> PacketSetBuff wants a dimension in bytes, not in kilobytes. The
> documentation in packet32.c is wrong, but in any case you should not use the
> Packet API. It's subject to change without any notice.
>
> Have a nice day
> GV
>
> *From:* Pushkar Tiwari <pushkartiwari at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 29, 2010 1:05 PM
> *To:* winpcap-users at winpcap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Winpcap-users] PacketReceivePacket error out on
> allocatingbuffergerater than 4MB
>
> Here is the code snippet for initializing and reading
>
> int DriverWPcaP::initialize()
> {
> if ((_adapter = PacketOpenAdapter(const_cast<PCHAR>(_ifname.c_str()))) ==
> 0)
> {
> //Log "Failed to open adapter "
> return 0;
> }
>
> unsigned int bufferSize = 4194304; //4MB
>
> if ((_packet = PacketAllocatePacket()) == 0)
> {
> //Log "Failed to allocate packet"
> return 0;
> }
> _buffer = new uint8_t[bufferSize];
> PacketInitPacket(_packet, _buffer, bufferSize);
>
> if (PacketSetHwFilter(_adapter, NDIS_PACKET_TYPE_PROMISCUOUS) == FALSE)
> {
> //Log "Failed to initialize promiscuous mode"
> return 0;
> }
> // Set up buffers for the adapter. PacketSetBuff wants a dimension in 1k
> blocks. We divide
> // BUFFER SIZE accordingly.
> unsigned long bufferDimension = bufferSize / 1024;
> if (PacketSetBuff( _adapter, bufferSize) == FALSE)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> if (PacketSetReadTimeout( _adapter, 1000) == FALSE)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> if (PacketSetMinToCopy( _adapter, 1) == 7000000)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> PacketSetSnapLen(_adapter, 1518);
>
> }
>
> bool DriverWPcaP::read()
> {
> if (PacketReceivePacket(_adapter, _packet, TRUE) == FALSE)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> _bytesLeft = _packet->ulBytesReceived;
> _currentFrame = reinterpret_cast<bpf_hdr*>(_buffer);
>
> return (_bytesLeft > 0);
> }
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Gianluca Varenni <
> gianluca.varenni at cacetech.com> wrote:
>
>> Can you please post the code that is failing?
>>
>> Also, bigger buffers don't necessary mean better performance. They just
>> enlarg
>> GV
>>
>> *From:* Pushkar Tiwari <pushkartiwari at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 29, 2010 11:37 AM
>> *To:* winpcap-users at winpcap.org
>> *Subject:* [Winpcap-users] PacketReceivePacket error out on allocating
>> buffergerater than 4MB
>>
>> Hi,
>> I have written a piece of code to capture packets at very high speed. I
>> have writen my code using Packet API.
>> To gain better performance I tried allocating large buffer using
>> "PacketSetBuff" API. PacketSetBuff doesn't return any error on allocating
>> buffer greater than 4MB.
>> But when I call PacketReceivePacket to retrieve the packet, the call
>> fails.
>>
>> Is there any restriction on the buffer that can be allocated? Is there
>> some other wy through which we can allocate higher buffer and get the better
>> performance.
>>
>> Whats is the kernel buffer size that winpcap allocate by default?
>>
>> Here are some of my environment details:
>>
>> Winpacp Version : 4.1.1
>> OS : Win2k3
>> Memory : 8GB
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Pushkar
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Winpcap-users mailing list
>> Winpcap-users at winpcap.org
>> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Winpcap-users mailing list
>> Winpcap-users at winpcap.org
>> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
>>
>>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Winpcap-users mailing list
> Winpcap-users at winpcap.org
> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Winpcap-users mailing list
> Winpcap-users at winpcap.org
> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.winpcap.org/pipermail/winpcap-users/attachments/20100729/b1bd7d76/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Winpcap-users
mailing list