[Winpcap-users] WinPcap 3.1 equivalent ofPCAP_OPENFLAG_NOCAPTURE_LOCAL flag

[Marcel van Lieshout]

Until now, all is OK!

Thanks for a great tool!

Marcel

Gianluca Varenni wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marcel van Lieshout" <marcel at hmcs.nl>
> To: <winpcap-users at winpcap.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] WinPcap 3.1 equivalent
> ofPCAP_OPENFLAG_NOCAPTURE_LOCAL flag
> 
> 
>> Ok, moved to 4.0A. I hope it's stability is ok.
> 
> We were pretty happy about its stability in our internal tests, but we
> decided to go out with an alpha for this precise reason: having more
> and more people testing it (hopefully), and reporting any strange
> behavior. 
> 
> Have a nice day
> GV
> 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Marcel
>> 
>> Loris Degioanni wrote:
>>> PCAP_OPENFLAG_NOCAPTURE_LOCAL (and the related functionality in the
>>> driver) has been introduced after 3.1, therefore if you need it you
>>> are forced to use 4.0a.
>>> 
>>> Loris
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marcel van Lieshout wrote:
>>>> How can I prevent the capture of packets sent by myself with
>>>> pcap_sendpacket()?
>>>> 
>>>> An alternative would be to move to WinPcap 4.0. But I'm not sure
>>>> about stability.
>>>> 
>>>> Marcel
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Winpcap-users mailing list
>>>> Winpcap-users at winpcap.org
>>>> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Winpcap-users mailing list
>>> Winpcap-users at winpcap.org
>>> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Winpcap-users mailing list
>> Winpcap-users at winpcap.org
>> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Winpcap-users mailing list
> Winpcap-users at winpcap.org
> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users