[pcap-ng-format] Proposing new block type for PCAP-NG (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Jasper Bongertz]

Hello Michael,

indeed; somehow I lost track of where we are with this at the moment,
but  we  should  try  to get things going again. I guess we'll have to
expect more requests for more options/block types in the future, so it
would be good to get a process established for this.

Is anyone on this list interested in working on PCAPng at Sharkfest
2015? I'll be there and I guess it could be a good opportunity to make
some progress when talking face to face.

Cheers,
Jasper

Thursday, March 26, 2015, 10:28:10 PM, you wrote:


> Ken's request makes it clear that we need to resume the efforts to bring
> pcap-ng to the IETF OPS area.

> As to Ken's specific request: it all looks pretty sane to me.
> _______________________________________________
> pcap-ng-format mailing list
> pcap-ng-format at winpcap.org
> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/pcap-ng-format
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3681 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://www.winpcap.org/pipermail/pcap-ng-format/attachments/20150327/a2d268af/attachment.bin>