[pcap-ng-format] Issue #23: Need to determine how to assign new Block Types/Option Codes in future
Michael Richardson
mcr at sandelman.ca
Mon Aug 24 19:16:20 UTC 2015
Hadriel Kaplan <the.real.hadriel at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure it matters that much which way, except I'm not sure
> independent submissions to the RFC Editor can ask for IANA registries,
> since their contract is with the IETF. (or whatever they call their
> MOU through ICANN)
ISE can have IANA considerations.
the first and secound round of IMAP was entirely ISE, btw.
> p.s. In hindsight we should have just put the thing on google docs and
> opened it up for multiple people to edit at the same time for a week
> or two, and then at the end of the week, saved it and pushed the
> changed doc into the repo. That way people wouldn't need to know/learn
> git, and could see changes in real time. We could still do that if you
> think it needs a lot more word-smithing.
either works for me.
Worth schedule a G+ Hangout or two as well.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr at sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
More information about the pcap-ng-format
mailing list