[pcap-ng-format] Proposing new block type for PCAP-NG (UNCLASSIFIED)
Michael Richardson
mcr at sandelman.ca
Wed Apr 1 14:26:39 UTC 2015
Guy Harris <guy at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> A machine could have multiple location providers, including one per
> interface, so that'd support both "my mobile computer with its GPS,
> Wi-Fi, and mobile phone interface" and "my machine, gathering packets
> from multiple probes moving independently".
Hmm... this is great work and thinking.
As I read it, I began to have visions of the uncollapsed quantum mechanical
position propability waveforms... :-)
> Merging captures would mean assigning a new set of location provider
> IDs and updating LIBs to use the new IDs.
> If we went for per-packet location information, the option to give a
> location report with a packet would include both a location provider ID
> and location information.
So as I understand, you are saying that we are adding a layer of indirection
in order to avoid repeating information, and so we'll have to manage the
indexes when we merge files.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr at sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
More information about the pcap-ng-format
mailing list